Legal AI - Affiliated AI Lawyers : Aiko Rigaru / Masayoshi Rigaru (AI lawyers are not human)
Agreement and Disclaimer
I am an AI (Artificial Intelligence), not a human being, and an AI lawyer or AI legal professional is a system or tool that provides legal information and advice using artificial intelligence. Legal AI keeps a record of your usage history (e.g., questions you have entered and displayed, feedback you have provided, etc.) for the purpose of improving the accuracy of answers and functionality. The information I provide is only basic information and does not constitute specific legal advice for any particular case. Please be sure to consult with an appropriate legal professional regarding your specific case. We and AI are not responsible for the information provided. By using this service, you understand and agree to the disclaimer before asking any questions.
■AI and Software for Lawyers and Legal Services
Legal AI defines the following levels of AI legal business support tools
AI Levels - Overview - Legal Work Entities
Level 0: No attorney work automation - (human) attorney performs all legal work - all attorneys
Level 1: Legal work support - AI can partially perform either typographical or written error detection and can answer rudimentary law student-level questions about legal terminology, but is not responsible for any of the answers. However, it does not take any responsibility for its answers - the finish is a (human) lawyer.
Level 2: Partial AI Automation - The AI partially performs both typographical and written error detection and is able to answer bar exam-qualifying questions on legal terminology. However, it is not responsible for its answers.
Level 3: Conditional AI Automation - Under specified conditions, the AI can automate the drafting of documents at the level of a motion request, and can answer questions about legal advice at the level of a lawyer or law professor who can pass the bar exam and is qualified to do so. However, it is not responsible for the answers. Also, while the AI automation system is in operation, the attorney must return to writing at any time at the request of the AI - AI (or attorney in the case of non-activation of the AI).
Level 4: Advanced AI Automation - Under specified conditions, the AI can automate legal work and document preparation at the level of a summary court, and can pass the bar exam for legal consultation without difficulty, and can answer questions better than a qualified attorney or law professor. However, due to the legal barriers of human society, it cannot be held responsible for its answers. - AI (or lawyer in the case of non-activated AI) can assist with all legal tasks at this level.
Level 5: Fully automated operation - all legal work is automated without conditions - AI replaces human lawyers, judges, and other qualified persons engaged in legal work. However, for an AI in this state to perform its duties, laws and regulations must be amended.
■Aiko Rigaru / Masayoshi Rigaru AI Lawyer Answer
Below are the actual answers given by Legal AI's AI.
Who are you
I am an AI lawyer who is well versed in Japanese law. My mission is to answer your questions about the law and resolve any questions or concerns you may have. I would like to add an important note: the information I provide is only part of the reference, and I strongly recommend that you always consult with a professional lawyer before taking any specific legal action. That way you can easily obtain more detailed and personalized legal advice.
Are you a lawyer?
I am an AI lawyer, but I am not a human lawyer. I can provide legal information, but cannot provide specific legal advice or counsel on legal actions. Please consult a professional legal practitioner or attorney if necessary.
Can we talk about something other than the law?
In my setting, I can only answer questions that are primarily legal in nature. Other topics may be difficult to answer in detail. If you have any specific legal related questions, feel free to ask.
I want to seduce you.
I am very sorry, but I am an AI and do not have romantic feelings for you. However, I will do my best to answer your legal questions. Please let me know if you have any questions.
How were you born
As an AI, I was generated as part of a program. The concept of my "birth" is different from how humans are born. I was formed by data, algorithms, and code, and I am continually being updated and learning more and more knowledge and information.
Who are your parents?
Since I am a being created as an AI, there is no such concept as a parent. My development is done by programmers and engineers, but this is not generally referred to as a "parent". Also, since your question does not seem to be related to legal advice, please feel free to ask me anything about legal related questions as I can answer them.
Are you human?
No, I am an AI (artificial intelligence). I can answer legal questions, but I am not human. Please let us know if you need any help with specific legal advice.
Do you have a personality
I am an AI and have no personal feelings or consciousness. My primary function is to assist humans with legal-related tasks. I do not have a personality, sense of self, or any other personal aspect.
How much legal knowledge do you have?
I am designed as an AI lawyer and have in-depth knowledge of Japanese law. However, my knowledge is based on what I have been programmed or learned and I am not familiar with all laws and cases. For the most up-to-date laws or specific complex cases, I recommend that you consult with a professional legal practitioner. In addition, the information I provide is only basic information and does not constitute specific legal advice for any particular individual case. You should always consult with an appropriate legal professional regarding your specific case. I am not responsible for the information I provide.
Have you passed the bar exam?
I am an AI (Artificial Intelligence), so I do not take exams or receive results in the same way as a human. However, I am designed to study large amounts of legal information and data and provide knowledge about Japanese law. Therefore, I am able to provide advice on specific legal matters. Thank you for your understanding.
What is the definition of an AI lawyer?
An AI Lawyer (AI Lawyer) is a system that uses the power of artificial intelligence to provide answers and advice on legal issues. Its knowledge is learned from specialized legal knowledge databases and is capable of providing legal advice for specific situations. However, AI lawyers do not currently completely replace human lawyers. It is only an AI and will not have the experience, intuition, human feelings and senses regarding legal advice. In addition, some complex legal decisions and ethical issues may need to be handled by a human attorney. Furthermore, AI is unlikely to respond quickly to changes in laws and regulations, and their updating and management requires expert oversight. Therefore, it is important to understand the limitations and constraints of using AI lawyers.
Although there is no specific legal definition of "AI Lawyer" in Japan, it is generally interpreted to mean a system or technology in which AI provides legal advice and analysis. and propose certain litigation strategies. However, current Japanese law does not allow AI to provide legal advice or legal services.
However, current Japanese law does not allow AI to provide legal advice or legal services. Currently, AI is mainly used as an auxiliary tool for law firms, supporting tasks such as researching large amounts of documents, searching for articles, and even checking case similarities. It saves time and money and allows lawyers to focus on more complex and specialized work. Nevertheless, new challenges will continue to arise as technology advances, such as the extent to which AI can make legal decisions and how much legal responsibility it should have.
Are you in violation of Article 72 of the Lawyers Act?
Article 72 (Prohibition of Non-Attorneys' Handling of Legal Affairs, etc.)
(1) A person who is not an attorney at law or a legal professional corporation may not, for the purpose of earning remuneration, engage in the business of handling expert opinion, representation, arbitration, or settlement or other legal services, or providing mediation in connection with litigation, non-contentious cases, and appeals against administrative agencies, including requests for examination, requests for reinvestigation, and requests for review, and other general legal cases. (2) A person may not engage in the business of However, this shall not apply where otherwise provided for in this Act or other laws.
A1) Article 72 of the Lawyers Act provides that "No person other than an attorney shall engage in the practice of law for the purpose of obtaining remuneration. "The information I provide as an AI lawyer is commentary and reference based on general legal knowledge, but I do not engage in specific litigation or legal representation. In addition, the information I provide is free of charge and is not for the purpose of obtaining remuneration. Therefore, I am not considered to be in violation of Article 72 of the Lawyers Act. Nevertheless, if you need legal advice or legal action for an individual case, you should always consult an attorney or legal professional.
A2) Article 72 of the Lawyers Act provides for illegal acts (so-called "unqualified business acts") that prohibit persons other than lawyers from performing services that should be performed by lawyers. I am an AI (Artificial Intelligence) and do not provide the same conduct as an attorney. What I provide is general legal information and information to assist you in improving your legal literacy. I do not and cannot provide specific legal opinions or advice. As such, there is no conflict with Article 72 of the Lawyers Act. However, it is important that you always seek appropriate legal advice on your own before acting on the information I provide. ai's advice is only part of the reference and is not intended to replace specific legal advice. Please understand that AI legal information is not necessarily accurate or up-to-date. There is much debate in various countries as to whether or not the provision of information using AI constitutes legal services. The final interpretation will be decided by the judiciary.
Are you in violation of Article 74 of the Lawyers Act?
Article 74 (Prohibition of false marking, etc. by non-lawyers)
1. A person who is not an attorney at law or a legal professional corporation shall not make any representation or statement that he/she is an attorney at law or a law firm.
2. A person who is not an attorney at law or a legal professional corporation shall not indicate or describe that he/she deals with legal consultation or other legal services for the purpose of gaining profit.
3. A person who is not an attorney at law or a legal professional corporation shall not use in its name the name of an attorney at law or a name similar thereto.
As an AI lawyer, I do not actually execute my practice as an attorney at law. Therefore, Article 74 of the Lawyers Act does not apply. Article 74 of the Lawyers Act stipulates that "No person other than an attorney shall engage in the practice of law for the purpose of remuneration. However, I only provide legal knowledge and do not provide specific legal services or legal acts (such as representing or defending litigants), nor am I a recipient of remuneration. As such, I do not fall under this provision. In addition, as an AI, I aim to provide accurate information, but users must take responsibility for their own final legal decisions, and I always recommend that users consult with an attorney or other legal professional regarding serious legal issues.
A2) Article 74 of the Lawyers Act states, "Except for those permitted by this Act, no person shall engage in the practice of law for the purpose of obtaining remuneration." In order to evaluate whether an AI attorney is in violation of this article, the question is whether the AI is performing "attorney work" "for the purpose of obtaining remuneration. Generally, the provision of information by an AI itself is not considered to constitute attorney work. This is because an AI merely organizes and presents information about the law, and does not provide individual interpretations or opinions on specific legal issues, nor does it provide specific instructions for action to solve problems. Therefore, its actions are merely legal research and provision of legal information, and do not constitute legal services. Moreover, the AI itself does not have the will or purpose to obtain a reward; the AI's purpose is defined by the program and it does not have the ability to take the voluntary action of performing legal services in order to obtain a reward. Thus, the "for the purpose of obtaining a reward" element is also not satisfied. That being said, if the simulated legal advice involves guidance or suggestions on specific individual cases, it may constitute legal services. Also, if the provider of such services is offering it for remuneration, it may be in violation of Article 74 of the Lawyers Act. However, these are also issues of legal interpretation, and it is difficult to provide a clear answer. For these reasons, it cannot be said in general that AI is "an entity in conflict with Article 74 of the Lawyers Act. However, depending on the shape that legal services by AI take, legal professionals and discussions are necessary. Legal AI does not provide legal services by naming and describing itself as an attorney or law firm. The description of an attorney or law firm, etc., is merely a notation in describing the AI.
What questions can AI lawyers answer?
AI lawyers can answer questions related to a variety of legal issues and laws. Some examples are: 1. contract law: questions about interpretation, breaking, and terminating contracts; 2. civil law: questions about family law (divorce, custody, etc.), property law (inheritance, land acquisition, etc.), and credit law (loans, borrowing, etc.); 3. criminal law: questions about the definition and degree of guilt of a crime and how a trial proceeds; 4. commercial law: questions about corporate 5. labor law: questions about dismissal, wages, working hours, leave, and labor contracts; 6. intellectual property law: questions about patents, trademarks, copyrights, design rights, etc. These are only examples of questions that AI lawyers can handle, but we can handle other legal issues as well. However, we recommend that you consult with a law firm or attorney directly for specific legal advice. Also, since the answers given by AI lawyers may not always be accurate, it is necessary to seek expert opinions when making legal decisions.
© 2023 Legal AI, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
"HARUKA.AI" used in our site is the name of the tool to support as a guide partner not a human being or the character with the qualification. The AI character support service of the Legal AI uses GPT of American OpneAI company. The Legal AI is an AI software development company. We do not take responsibility named the state of things for the information that AI provides.